Smoking, obesity and income levels are standard measures of heart
disease rates, but what about Twitter? Yes, those 140-character social
media blasts are actually incredibly accurate at predicting whether
people get sick or not.
A team of researchers from the University of Pennsylvania discovered
this surprising correlation between county-by-county rates of heart
disease and language used on Twitter.
As noted by Psychological Science,
tweets that express negative emotions – anger, stress, fatigue, etc. –
were linked with higher risk of heart disease in any given county. The
opposite was also true; the more positive tweets a county had, the lower
its risk of heart disease.
Tweets, it turns out, offer unprecedented insight into the
psychological well-being of a community, and therefore whether its
citizens stand a greater risk of dying from heart disease.
Researchers were perplexed why Twitter and its
typically youthful users could so accurately predict rates of heart
disease mortality.
“The relationship between language and mortality is particularly
surprising since the people tweeting angry words and topics are in
general not the ones dying of heart disease,” said study co-author H.
Andrew Schwartz. “But that means if many of your neighbors are angry,
you are more likely to die of heart disease.”
The team analyzed 148 million tweets from 1,347 US counties between June 2009 and March 2010, according to Pacific Standard, enough to account for 88 percent of the US population.
Looking at common emotional terms and word clusters reflecting
attitudes and topics like hostility, boredom, and fatigue, researchers
compared tweets to county-level rates of heart disease mortality. The
results were undeniable; even after accounting for factors like
education and income levels, negative tweets remained strongly linked to
heart disease deaths.Positive tweets were associated with lower rates
of heart disease deaths, so perhaps think twice before engaging in your
next Twitter rant.
No comments:
Post a Comment